Leaderboard

Here is a list of items resolved for 3.5.0 - http://dev.blesta.com/browse/CORE-1715?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%223.5.0%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed) Nothing really critical, but it would give you an idea of what you're missing if you run with 3.5 beta 5 now. Of course we don't recommend using a beta in production, and the final release should be out within a week. (Either this week, or more likely, early next week) We don't like to release late in the week.

Good suggestion. I've assigned this to CORE-1360.

This will be in 3.5 as apart of CORE-1717.

I'm going to close thread this as not a bug with Blesta. However, it would be useful to avoid this problem altogether by (CORE-1677) validating service fields before queuing them, which would be an improvement for sometime in the future.

If you want to fix this yourself, Open /app/models/services.php and find: $module->changeServicePackage($package_from, $package, $service, $parent_package, $parent_service); if (($errors = $module->errors())) { $this->Input->setErrors($errors); return; } Replace with: $service_info = $module->changeServicePackage($package_from, $package, $service, $parent_package, $parent_service); if (($errors = $module->errors())) { $this->Input->setErrors($errors); return; } elseif ($service_info && is_array($service_info)) { $this->setFields($service_id, $service_info); $service = $this->get($service_id); }

Looks like they're both getting loaded but thanks for the recommendation.

I believe the problem is an upgrade (change of package) to a different plan (SSD-5) that updates the plan with the module but does not update the service in Blesta to the new plan. The plan is then out of sync with SolusVM, accounting for the discrepancies in values like extra memory that rely on the plan for proper calculation. The larger issue here is described in CORE-1669.

Sample: class MyController extends AppController { ... public function method() { // Load the model to use to query the database $this->uses(array("Clients")); // Fetch client ID 1 $client = $this->Clients->get(1); // Make the client available to the template in the variable "$client1" $this->set("client1", $client); } ... }

It looks like this: {% for option in service.options %} {option.option_label}: {option.option_value} @ {option.option_pricing_price | numberformat 2, ".", ","} {option.option_pricing_period} {% endfor %} We used that for example for our SolusVM until we got a module: Unlimited Slaves: 1 @ $20.00 month If you are using the package section and not the services section you wan to use for option in package.options More information: https://licensecart.com/billing/plugin/support_manager/knowledgebase/view/293/can-i-show-config-options-in-the-welcome-emails/1/

i was forcing the same issue already when i was working in adminLTE template . i think blesta should think about a way that let the developpers/designer to add thier own function or request in the template, as now ,we can just use what blesta offer . there a re a old thread about this subject .

I'm not sure if this clarifies anything, but Blesta needs to be able to write to the /config/ directory, including the /config/blesta-new.php config file. During installation it copies the blesta-new.php file and create the blesta.php config file populating the correct database, system key, and other information to blesta.php using blesta-new.php as a sort of template. If anything is preventing those files from being written, then you'll get the error you seem to be getting. What is interfering is really the question, and if it's not related to the file permissions then it may be something else server side. (Any other security related plugins?)

My personal opinion Blesta Support Manager is one of the most beutiful themed out there (comparing against WHMCS/ClientExec/HostBill and the older AWBS/WHMAutopilot/ModernBill) But you can eseally theme on your own, just edit the .pdt and .css files in /views/default/ under the supportmanagerpro plugin forlder

Quickbooks integration is on our "We'd like to do that, but won't happen for a while" list. If you can get it done for $275 I'd say go for it. It would cost us more than that just to plan the plugin. One thing you might want to consider with respect to accounting is the fact that an online payment (such as credit card) is not considered income until it has been deposited into your bank. So to automate your accounting, you need the ability to reconcile payments before you add them to Quickbooks.