Leaderboard

Hi I bring today a very useful plugin. This is a Uptime Robot and Server Monitoring Plugin, Requires ssh2 installed in the server for Server Monitoring. Features Uptime Robot Check the server every 5 minutes Alerts over Email or via SMS with Twilio Server Monitoring (Requires ssh2 and root Password) Automatic updates (Updates the software and packages every day, via yum or apt-get) RAM Alerts (If only have 10% free) HDD Alerts (If only have 10% free) CPU Alerts (If CPU usage is more than 80%) Update [07/08/15]: Now is possible delete a server Fixed problems with emails I don't have screenshots, but I have a video. https://youtu.be/haI03KEbWSg UPDATE: In some cases the plugin don't create the Cron Job Task, If this occurs login into PHPMyAdmin, Go to your blesta database and go to the cron_task_runs and add the following entry: id => n+1 task_id => Cron Task ID (You can view this in the cron_tasks table) company_id => Your Company ID (Normally 1) time => NULL interval => 5 enabled => 1 date_enabled => 2012-01-01 00:00:00 uptime_robot.zip

And despite all of that, WHMCS is the industry leader. Blesta would be wise to take as many cues as possible from WHMCS. > See the big picture, maybe Microsoft should copy Sony because more people like the PS4. Well, yeah.

You can use friendly names in the host name field. Yes

there is no wrong in that. you're exaggerating.

you don't understand. it not about brands or cars or copying features. it's about ease. secondly relating to your car example: whmcs is making car, blesta is making car so why blesta is not putting all the features in the car like whmcs is putting ?? maybe everyone doesn't need cruise control but some want it. also this adamant behaviour has to go. software is made for people. people are not made for software. if you won't do it someone else will do it and people who came from whmcs to blesta will go away from blesta to that other one.

maybe Blesta shouldnt copy features from others ... . . . . but should create features that should be exist in default . that is

normally blesta should add a filter box , to search record from the table or database . we have this issue with some clients . clients has more than 50 services , and we need to load pages and select the service to manage it . a better way is to add a search box in the header table to search for a given value , and return just the services matching the value .

from my opinion in the blesta forum there are 2 groups ; first Group , is satisfied with blesta and need more plugins like mass mailer and affiliate system and ...ect , the most of them not selling domains and hosting . second group , is dreaming with the refacor of domain management and better implementation of order form of hosting , all them are a hosting proviers . blesta team, maybe are divided with them , what is priority and wich can alive without what they request ? blesta team is hearing more from who can sponsor the next feature , v3.5 was a lot of features in term of solusvm and configurable options , all this features was sponsored , and i see the v 4.0.0 has a new raod of EU law with sponsored features also . my suggestion for blesta team , shouldn't always listen to sponsored features , because some task are from v3.0.0 and not yet implemented , and if blesta will add only features that are sponsored , because other has been payed for the licence in hope of blesta can correct add what he promise in thier tasks . so i will vote for the domain management . is priority thatn any other task , even if EU law support .