ExpertIntegrations
-
Posts
15 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Posts posted by ExpertIntegrations
-
-
14 minutes ago, Licensecart said:
I'm a bit confused too mate since it's open code minus 3 files: might be a Theme License maybe ask Dave mate.
From the website, this looks to be exactly the license type they would need. But information is limited, I would agree as well, I'd contact to make sure.
-
-
6 hours ago, Licensecart said:
I believe they want more money, they got rid of LicensePal, etc a few years back to get more money they claim its to support the customers direct, they have now got rid of the owned we take it to get more money, they'll be making resellers tiered and more like affiliates so that's to make more money lol.
You got a great point here. All license will be held directly w/o any third party access again as you mentioned to make more money I honestly didn't look at this way. To me this is wrong & shouldn't be this way.
-
On 10/8/2016 at 7:07 AM, Hix said:
count me in - we're leaving WHMCS - like a - for good.
The main reason is the inability to buy further "owned" licenses and loss of trust in WHMCS company in general.
I dont have issues with levels of new prices, I just REFUSE to have a key company software - a billing - "just rented". I need a "boxed" version just for my peace of mind.
I couldn't agree more here. The pricing plans are just fine & that is doable & acceptable, but when you start forcing clients to 'rent' a license then that becomes a problem. I won't speak for anyone but me I don't like rented. I feel this move here WHMCS has taken the wrong move here, but time will tell how hard its going to be. But just from the small discussion in this thread proves the point.
But the question begs to be answered, why would WHMCS take such a move of removing 'owned' license from there line-up? It makes me feel they are following the foot steps of Kayako it used to be a very great helpdesk software solution; until they decided to take the route of removing there owned license from there line-up & then went a step further in having 'hosted solutions' only & forcing there clients to convert there 'owned' license to a 'hosted' solution monthly payment just to use kayako 5!
-
I was a bit confused on this, I was checking out his site & thought well nice ( Logo was blah ); then I went to check out his blesta all integrated. Well that wasn't the case I seen WHMCS, I am thinking why didn't he just post that over at WHMCS forums? I am not bashing WHMCS it just would have made more sense posting over at WHMCS wouldn't you think?
-
-
-
15 hours ago, Paul said:
I expected this, but I didn't think they would move toward a per-client pricing model and drop owned licenses. People really don't like that pricing model.. but the worst part of it is this: If you use WHMCS, they know how many customers you have. They know what modules you're using. They are collecting that data. How will they use it? Maybe cPanel will market to hosting providers using WHMCS that don't yet use cPanel. If the information gets out, how will someone else use it? Something to think about.
This is a great point that you pointed out paul, & honestly I had no idea this much data was being collected & stored. & I am sure there is others out there that didn't know this as well. It sure does give me something to think about, that's for sure.
-
2 hours ago, Paul said:
Font Awesome icons because they are modern and clean and vector so they look great on high resolution screens. It also makes it very easy for plugin makers to use a wide range of icons since all the Font Awesome "font" is available to the system.
I'll consider another tease, but the next tease may just be the beta. Worked through some issues last week with the new minPHP. Couple more to figure out, like why the "Remember Me" option doesn't work.. some incompatibility with the minPHP bridge I'm sure.
Very wise choice here in my opinion. Yeah another teaser would be nice, & yeah beta would even better!
-
On 7/28/2016 at 2:15 PM, Paul said:
The new default theme will be missing shadows and virtually all gradients, and icons are replaced with font-awesome. However, you can enable shadows and use gradients on a per-theme basis if you like them. I think it looks cleaner and more modern without the shadows and gradients and font-awesome icons look great on retina displays.
I agree 100% w/ this paul, I think it is a clean and crisp styling. Plus you will find it easier to updating a font-icon then you would updating a static image, plus getting rid of the gradient is another right move into the right direction; as I feel gradient is absolute these day in the design world. But that is just my opinion & I am sure some would agree & some would disagree w/ this fact.
What was the thought behind removing icons for font-icons was it the simple fact of convenience & for faster response on loading to make it quicker?
16 hours ago, jobplease said:is there any more sneaks peeks ?
Yeah I think @Paul is just trying to tease everyone w/ a small update & keeping everyone in suspense & wanting more!. haha j/k. Nice work btw, the styling of this new blesta theme is looking amazing & must say very fine work you'll are doing!
-
-
If the client is trying to change the Nameservers within the client side of blesta system. & the domain is locked within the registrar then the valued nameservers that was set prior to the locking will stay the same value until the domain is unlocked. Even though you are forcing the changes in the admin side, the values are not going to 'really' change. Please someone correct me if I am wrong here people.
-
Yeah I noticed that a lot of these community forums are being exploited, I know there is a few car forums that I belong to seem to got done the same way WHT got done. So apparently this is a wide spread issue & hopefully something can be done to help minimize any future exploits to help safe-guard users & there private sensitive details.
-
Salt and vinegar chips
in The Lounge
Posted
+1 on liking slat & vinegar chips! & I must say this is a very interesting topic to be seen on a billing/support software company forum. But hey there is a first time for everything huh? LOL