evolvewh

Last night, I was looking into the way Google was crawling my site and they were seeing duplicate content from /page-name and /page-name/ so I added the Canonical Tag to my structure.pdt file and it was still happening. I found a tutorial with this code to add to the .htaccess file that cured the problem (it removes the / on the end of any URL): RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule ^(.*)/$ /$1 [L,R=301] The ONLY issues I've found with this is that ticket merging stops working for some strange reason and the client search does not work. Does anyone have any insight as to why this might be happening? I'm wondering if there is a way to restrict this rule from the admin section?

I guess I worded it wrong and should have said 'the ability to use 2 merchant gateways at once'. I am using the core Bluepay module so if that means it's 'onsite' storage which I believe it is, I should be able to easily make the switch and I'll use 'onsite' storage for Stripe. I appreciate the detailed response.

I was missing a simple step late at night and I got it taken care of. Thank you for your reply.

I created a custom field and I have 2 customer groups created in the system. I'm unable to make that custom field show up for the additional group. It only shows up for 'general'. Is the system supposed to behave this way?

I currently use Blue Pay as my merchant account but my contract expires with them in a couple of months. I signed up with Stripe to test it out but I tried to leave both gateways active and able to accept in USD. Blesta will not allow me to active Stripe while Blue Pay is active (USD - already used by Bluepay is what it says and I can't check the box). So my questions are: 1) Is there a reason 2 merchant gateways can't be active at once? 2) If I were to disable Blue Pay and activate Stripe, will I lose the credit cards I currently store or would I have to some how assign each card back to the right client account? I don't want to cause any headache for clients or even more work for myself with this. I do want to use the option to let Blesta store the credit cards. Thanks!

It would be nice to have an option within the Payment gateways to assign client groups to them. As an example, I have certain clients that I will allow to pay by check or cash so I have a client group setup for them but I'd like to limit the 'offline payment' gateway to that group of clients only. I don't want to take orders for domains, hosting, etc and allow just anyone to pay by check. I think that would turn into a huge mess (bounced checks, people not mailing in the checks, etc). Thinking about it a little more, I can also see it tying into the other feature that has been mentioned to allow specific invoices to be paid by auto debit or offline. I also wanted to setup the separate client group so that these invoices can go out sooner. Some companies outsource bill paying to their accountant or other companies and it takes more time to process the check and mail it in.

I think this will help with iOS: https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/DataManagement/Conceptual/EventKitProgGuide/Introduction/Introduction.html

I don't know what's involved and if others would want this but I think it will make the Blesta Calendar more functional. Integrating with iCloud, Google, etc to sync a few of the more popular calendars into Blesta. Right now, you would have to maintain 2 different calendars and this would streamline that process and make it more functional within Blesta.

Thank you!

Makes sense and of course I have no idea on any of the coding. Just hoping it comes along as a feature sooner rather than later.

How hard is it in terms of programming to add the feature to delete tickets? I know Blesta likes to hold onto everything but I really think it should be up to the user of the software to decide what they want to do with the tickets they receive. I'm constantly logging into my database and deleting stuff (not from clients) that I don't want to keep around.

Makes sense and I didn't look at it that way. I wasn't using any fraud detection plugin and it was obvious this was fraud so I manually marked the order.

I can certainly do this now that I know how you guys designed it. I do think it would make more sense to just wipe out the associated services once it's determined that the order is fraud and marked accordingly.

I had an order come through a few days ago that was fraud and I marked the orders as fraud and voided the transactions. I'm now looking under 'services' and these are all listed as 'in review'. Shouldn't they have disappeared or been placed elsewhere? Learning the system still....

The release notes look great. I can't participate in the beta at the moment but I'm looking forward to the final release. Keep up the great work.

I mis read your message the other day and I do have DKIM and SPF records setup already. I'm getting to the bottom of it now and it has to do with the file permission that I mentioned earlier and system mail configurations that I had done awhile back. It's been frustrating but a learning experience too! I appreciate all of the assistance.

I think I have it solved now. pipe.php has to be set to 700 (777 is fully executable) and I had to add the hashbang to the first line of the file. So far it's all working properly and if I get through the first 24 hours, I should be good to go. What was happening is I'd get a spam message and then the 'mail undeliverable' message kept getting kicked back to me over and over and over again.

I could use some help here. This has been the most miserable piping to setup for some unknown reason.

Hi, I don't have a TXT dns record and the permissions have been tried with 644, 700, 755 and 777. Nothing seems to work here.

Not blaming anyone or anything. Just trying to make it all work! The original pipe.php file with permissions set to 644, 755 or 777 will not work for me. The one mentioned in the other thread (the hashbang change) does work on 755 or 777 for me. I did the following in WHM to hopefully cut out a lot of spam: Home »Service Configuration »Exim Configuration Manager, "Sender Verification" and "Sender Verification Callouts With that option, anytime the server receives mail, it contacts the published mail exchanger for the sender address and verifies whether the sender address is actually a valid one that can receive mail.

Hi, I'm running Blesta 3.5.3 and I'm unable to successfully make piping work. I tried the suggested forwarder and it sends the client a message saying the email is un deliverable. I'm using cPanel and I tried usr/bin/php and usr/local/bin/php Then I tried this suggestion: http://www.blesta.com/forums/index.php?/topic/1017-email-piping/?p=8838 It works but because the pipe.php file is set to 755, I get a spammer sending a message and causing a loop that sends 50k+ 'mail undeliverable: return to sender' messages. I'm not opposed to using POP3/IMAP but I need to understand how they work first. Any suggestions? DL

You haven't even seen it..... wait until I get it figured out and show you!

If I can figure out the code for the controller, I can post it all here and you can make sure it meets Blesta standards.

I honestly think there is plenty of room to add one more column in this table. Just my opinion.

I figured that was the case. I'm guessing this isn't something that you guys want to have added to the core?